Nevertheless, the author goes into helpful detail about the practical day-to-day use of Chrome vs. For example, the author complains, correctly, about Chrome, but doesnвЂ™t seem aware of AppleвЂ™s privacy efforts in general and the option to block cross-site tracking in High SierraвЂ™s Safari. There are a few minor technical oversights in this splendid essay. That works for me, so long as the subsequent handling of search results remains under proper control. Ironically, Mozilla supports its developers using revenue from Google, which pays the nonprofit to have Google Search as FirefoxвЂ™s default search engine. This enables the Mozilla Corporation to collect revenue to support its development of Firefox and other internet services. Though Mozilla itself is a nonprofit, Firefox is developed within a corporation owned by the nonprofit.

ThatвЂ™s not to say that the Firefox developers are starving artists, unable to match the expertise of their competitors. вЂWe do not collect personally identifiable data, not what you do or what websites you go to.вЂ™ вЂWe put the user first in terms of privacy,вЂ™ Dolanjski says. Instead, FirefoxвЂ™s designers and developers try to make the best decision on behalf of the user, while always leaning toward privacy first. Core to their philosophy? Privacy and convenience donвЂ™t have to be mutually exclusive. I spoke to Madhava Enros, the senior director of Firefox UX, and Peter Dolanjski, a product manager for Firefox, to learn more about how MozillaвЂ™s browser builds privacy into its architecture.

Chrome vs safari vs firefox mac